City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1ConcurrenceEdmondson, J.
¶ 1 The Constitution and our previous opinions support the Court’s analysis, and I write separately to provide a more detailed explanation why the Court’s opinion is correct.
¶ 2 The Oklahoma Constitution states that a statute may be classified as a “general law” or a “special law.” When the Legislature has created an alleged special law in violation of Art. 5 § 59, the Court has determined whether the classification was reasonable. If the law is reasonable it is a general law, not a constitutionally allowed special law. Article 5 § 46 also prohibits special laws. The Court has used its § 59…
Also in this document: Dissent · Ala; Dissent · Taylor.
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.