Legal Opinion

Hasselbring v. Koepke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1933No. Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 36,976PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Bill to enjoin interference with a claimed easement. From the decree entered both parties appeal. Plaintiffs own lands in the city of Flint and claim an easement arising out of a conveyance describing the lands and easement as ,the “south one-third of lot 7, block 3, of the village of Flint River as platted,, now in the city of Flint, Michigan, being 22 feet frontage on Saginaw street and running back to Brush street with the exception of 4 feet off the south side of the east 90 feet of said south one-third of lot 7, block 3. Said 4 feet owned by party of the first part shall be used jointly…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Burke v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Blackhawk Development Corp. v. Village of DexterMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Nelson v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  5. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API