Legal Opinion

Malinoski v. D. S. McGrath, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1933PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These two suits in equity are brought to secure the removal of a concrete wall and filling placed upon the land of the plaintiffs and for damages. One is against the city alleged to have ordered the work to be done, and the other against the contractor alleged to have performed the work. Each defendant averred in its answer that the constructions and work of which the plaintiffs complain were ordered by the commissioner of public works of the city, and that the land described in the plaintiffs’ bill was taken by him in connection with the great flood of November, 1927, in accordance with law,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity v. PufferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Lynch v. Union Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. BealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Geragosian v. Union Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. M. H. Gordon & Son, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Gordon v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API