Legal Opinion

Electro Metallurgical Co. v. Krupp Nirosta Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 15, 1940No. 1254PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIELDS, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity under section 4915, U.S.R.S., as amended, 35 U.S.C. A. § 63, for a decree that Electro Metallurgical Company, plaintiff, is entitled “to receive a patent” for the invention specified in claims 1, 2 and 9 of the patent awarded to Schafmeister, defendant’s assignor.

Paul Schafmeister originally was a codefendant. He filed a disclaimer in this court and the bill of complaint was dismissed as to him.

Plaintiff, Electro Metallurgical Company, is the owner of patent application serial No. 593,928 filed by plaintiffs Frederick M. Becket and Russell…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. Kraft Foods Co. v. Walther Dairy ProductsDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1954
  3. Sperry Products, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  4. Sydney Archer v. Domenick PapaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  5. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API