Legal Opinion
Sperry Products, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of America
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 6, 1959No. Civ. A. 31352PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McNAMEE, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of four patents of plaintiff, Floyd A. Firestone, Nos. 2,280,226, 2,398,701, 2,467,-301 and 2,592,134, which will be referred to sometimes hereinafter as Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. All of the patents relate to flaw detection apparatus and the use thereof. The Claims of the patents which it is alleged were infringed are Patent No. 1, Claims 2, 3, 4, 10 and 11; Patent No. 2, Claims 7, 16, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29 and 32; Patent No. 3, Claims 1, 2 and 3; Patent No. 4, Claim 2.
The Parties
The pjaintiffs are: Floyd A. Firestone, inventor of all four…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kolene Corporation, and Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber Scheideanstalt Vormals Roessler v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
- Geo. J. Meyer Manufacturing Co., a Wisconsin Corporation v. San Marino Electronic Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Laitram Corporation v. King Crab, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.