Legal Opinion

E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 10, 1954No. Civ. 1005-51PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGUIRE, District Judge.

This is a suit filed under the provisions of R.S. § 4915 as amended, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. Since its filing Section 63 has been repealed and recodified by Sections 145 and 146 of Title 35. The plaintiff seeks to reverse a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the Patent Office which awarded priority to Defendants Paden and Mackay, and the consequent refusal of that tribunal to grant plaintiffs a patent. The invention involved relates to a process for the production of melamine by heating urea and ammonia under pressure.

The interference arose out of the filing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Korman v. NobileDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1960
  2. Edwin H. Land and Meroe M. Morse v. Francis A. Regan, Jr., Seamon A. Lincoln and Donald E. HansonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Eastman Kodak Company v. EI DuPONT De NEMOURS & COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
  4. Radio Corporation of America v. Philco CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
  5. S. W. Farber, Inc. v. Texas Instruments, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API