State v. Loren
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the trial court committed prejudicial error in permitting a police officer to testify that defendant “was acting like he was trying to hide something”. This assignment has no merit.
The challenged testimony was offered by Deputy Sheriff Hank Whitmire. He testified that he was on duty during the early morning hours of 6 May 1980; that after a warrant was issued for defendant’s arrest, he passed a car which he recognized as defendant’s car; that after some difficulty, he succeeded in getting defendant’s car to stop; that he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. YanceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MalachiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.