Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1986No. 528A85PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented for our review is whether the trial court committed reversible error by prohibiting defense counsel from reading to the jury an excerpt from a Court of Appeals’ opinion during his closing argument. Defendant argues that the trial court’s ruling was improper and prejudicial because it prevented him from presenting a complete defense. The burden of showing the trial court’s error and its resulting prejudice is on defendant. N.C.G.S. § 15A-1443(a) (1983); State v. Loren, 302 N.C. 607, 613, 276 S.E. 2d 365, 369 (1981). We first deal with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. NolandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. MilbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. AliSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API