State v. Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in: (1) admitting opinion testimony as to defendant’s age; (2) refusing to exclude evidence of defendant’s age obtained during the booking process; (3) refusing to permit defense counsel in closing argument to read the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution; (4) improperly instructing the jury as to indecent liberties; and (5) denying defendant’s motion for mistrial because of the behavior of a *755juror during jury deliberations. We conclude the trial court erred only in refusing to permit defense counsel to read the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. HerrinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- United States v. Alvin James PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.