Legal Opinion

Copeland Planned Futures, Inc. v. Obenchain

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 29, 1973No. 1207-1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

— The question presented is whether a default judgment, entered in New York against a nonresident defendant on his unpaid promissory note pursuant to New York’s Simplified Procedure for Court Determination of Disputes as authorized by the note, is entitled to full faith and credit in Washington.We hold the judgment to be so entitled and affirm the judgment for the reasons later stated.

On April 24, 1963, defendant Dean F. Obenchain, then a New York resident, entered into a program with plaintiff Copeland Planned Futures, Inc. in New York to finance the former’s payment of life insurance…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Perry v. Continental Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Pitt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Matson v. MatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Co. v. ZiomekMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Marworth, Inc. v. McGuireSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API