Legal Opinion

Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Co. v. Ziomek

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2005No. Docket 248909PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZahra, J.

Relying on a forum-selection clause in a loan agreement allegedly executed by the litigants, plaintiff sought and obtained an arbitration award in California and subsequently obtained a California judgment confirming the arbitration award. Plaintiff commenced this action in Michigan to enforce the California judgment. At issue is whether the Michigan trial court erred in examining the alleged agreement to determine whether a valid contract existed that gave the California court jurisdiction over defendants. We hold that the court properly examined the agreement to determine jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Turcheck v. Amerifund Financial, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Dunn v. BennettMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Greater Bethesda Healing Springs Ministry v. Evangel Builders & Construction Managers, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Delphi Automotive PLC v. AbsmeierDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API