Pitt v. Little
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Rice, J., entered January 5, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action on a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action was commenced by Thomas Pitt and A. H. Peterson, copartners as Pitt & Peterson, against A. C. Little, to recover an indebtedness claimed to be due on a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendant. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiffs have appealed from the final judgment entered thereon.
The appellants’ controlling contention is that the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict and judgment in their favor. The original note read as follows:
“Due Oct. 1 st-03. $206.39-100.
“Victoria, B. C., Febr. 1st 1903.
“Eight months after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baldwin v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Anderson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Gunderson v. GundersonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Galena National Bank v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Daniel v. Gold Hill Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Skagit State Bank v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Tisdel v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Whitcomb v. National Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Gannon v. BronstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Jones v. WettlinWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.