Legal Opinion
SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 24, 1972No. 70-6PublishedCited by 198 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
This appeal, heard as a companion to D. H. Overmyer Co. v. Frick Co., ante, p. 174, decided today, also purports to raise for the Court the issue of the due process validity of cognovit provisions. The system under challenge in this case is that of Pennsylvania.1 The three-judge District Court, with one judge dissenting in part because, in his view, the court did not go far enough, refrained from declaring the Commonwealth’s rules and statutes unconstitutional on their face and granted declaratory and injunctive relief only for a limited class of cognovit signers. 314 F. Supp. 1091 (ED Pa.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Swarb v. LennoxDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Cutler Corp. v. LatshawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Atlas Credit Corp. v. EzrineNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Smith v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Osmond v. SpenceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by198 opinions
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Joe J. Jordan James E. Mitchell Jordan Mitchell, Inc. v. Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, Joe J. Jordan James E. Mitchell Jordan Mitchell, Inc., on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Arnold T. Berman Myron J. Berman John J. Petit, Jr., Prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Joe J. Jordan James E. Mitchell Jordan Mitchell, Inc., at No. 92-1424, Arnold T. Berman and Myron J. Berman, at No. 92-1456Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Jones v. Nissenbaum, Rudolph & SeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Zannino v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.