Legal Opinion

Spinks v. Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1905No. L.A. No. 1378PublishedCited by 28 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an action to rescind a contract whereby certain real property of the plaintiff was exchanged for certain oil stock of defendants Clark and Bryan in the Westlake Oil Company. The exchange was effected June 6, 1900. The action was commenced September 21, 1901. The cause of action stated in the original complaint was one for the rescission of the contract upon the ground of fraudulent misrepresentations on the part of Clark and Bryan. On the trial, the complaint was amended by adding thereto certain allegations designed to show, in addition to the actual fraud theretofore alleged, a case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burke v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Conrad v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API