Legal Opinion

Jack v. Armour & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 20, 1923No. 6207PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, sued defendants in error, at law, for treble damages averred to have accrued to him from defendants, by reason of alleged violations by defendants, of the provisions of the Act of July 2,1890, commonly called the “Sherman Anti-Trust Act” (Comp. St. '§§ 8820-8823, 8827-8830), and the amendments thereto. The trial court sustained a motion of defendants to strike plaintiff’s petition from the files, and he brings error.

But two questions are presented. One of these arises in limine, and questions the correctness of the court’s action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Porter v. MackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Shohoney v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. Darrow v. BriggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Locker v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  2. Beegle v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Ernie M. Duff v. The Kansas City Star Company, a Corporation, and Emil A. SeesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  4. Gerli v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  5. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API