Legal Opinion
Alexander Milburn Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1926No. 2467PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This action was instituted to recover triple damages under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (Comp. St. §§ 8820-8823, 8827-8830). At the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, the District Judge sustained defendants’ motion for a directed verdict, and the correctness of this ruling is practically the only question presented by the writ of error. While many exceptions were taken to the exclusion of testimony, it is unnecessary to consider them in detail, for, in passing upon the exception to the direction of the verdict, we have reviewed the excluded testimony as well as that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. WinslowSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Jack v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Rice v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Miller Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.