Legal Opinion

Porter v. Mack

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1901PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Hancock County. Action by John Porter against John M. Mack and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Greenberry B. Boren brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DeNT, Judge:

John M. Mack and Greenberry B. Boren, defendants, feeling aggrieved by the judgment of .the circuit court of Hancock County against them in favor of John Porter for the sum of eighteen thousand three hundred and thirty-three dollars, assign three hundred and fifty-four reasons why such judgment should not be permitted to stand.

The first is the overruling of the general demurrer to the declaration, that is to say, admitting its allegations to be true, they fail to show a sufficient cause of action against defendants. The action is trespass on the case in the nature of a conspiracy…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Vinal v. CoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Adler v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Kimball v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  4. Phelps v. . NowlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Jim Beard and Hubbard Beard v. Melvin StephensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. Preiser v. MacQueenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. National Park Bank v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API