Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Bolner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowe, J.

The appellee, as plaintiff, sued the appellant, as defendant, before a justice of the peace of Blackford county, to recover the value of certain stock killed by the appellant.

From the judgment of the justice, the cause was appealed to the court below.

Appellee’s complaint was in two paragraphs. The first paragraph was for killing a sheep, and the second paragraph was for killing a steer.

In both paragraphs, the appellee alleged, that the stock was killed at a point on appellant’s railroad, where said railroad was not securely fenced in, but could and ought lawfully to have been fenced. In the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati & Martinsville Railroad v. PaskinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Cincinnati & Martinsville Railroad v. TownsendIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. LevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. HannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. NorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. BunnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API