Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. Bunnell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Erom the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit to recover for stock killed.

The complaint was by William Bunnell, the appellee, against the Cincinnati, Hamilton and Dayton Railroad Company, and charged, that the defendant, by its employees and agents, while running a locomotive and train of cars over said defendant’s railroad, in Fayette county, Indiana, on, etc., said locomotive and train of cars struck and killed one horse in Fayette county, Indiana, at a point where said road was not fenced, etc., the property of the plaintiff, of the value of two hundred dollars. Wherefore, etc.

Demurrer to the complaint overruled, and exception…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Madison Railroad v. SolomonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BolnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Cincinnati & Martinsville Railroad v. PaskinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. HannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Cincinnati & Martinsville Railroad v. TownsendIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. LevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API