Legal Opinion

Cincinnati & Martinsville Railroad v. Townsend

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Johnson Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Two errors are assigned by the appellants in this case; first, overruling the separate demurrers of the appellants to the complaint; second, overruling the motion of the appellants for a new trial.

The complaint, after the usual commencement, alleged that on the-day of October, 1868, at and in the county of Johnson, and State of Indiana, the said Indianapolis, Cincinnati, and Lafayette Railroad Company, while running and propelling their locomotive and cars along and upon that part of the road of the Cincinnati and Martinsville Railroad Company which is situated in said county of Johnson, and *39w…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati & Martinsville Railroad v. PaskinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago Railroad v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BolnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. BunnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API