Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. Hannon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this action the appellee, as plaintiff, sued jfche appellant, as defendant, before a justice of the peace of Grant county, Indiana, to recover the value of twenty-two sheep. Omitting the venue and title of the cause, and the signature of counsel, the appellee’s complaint was as follows:

“ Said plaintiff, Audley M. Hannon, complains of the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and St. Louis Railroad Company, and says, that, on or about the — day of-, 1875, at the county of Grant, and State of Indiana, by their agent operating and running a locomotive and train of cars on said company’s railroad, in Grant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BolnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. TroxellIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. LevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Louisville New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Strader v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API