Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hunt
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
In this action, the appellee sued the appellant in a complaint of two paragraphs, to recover damages for the killing of two milch cows, owned by the appellee, on the line of the appellant’s railroad.
The appellant answered in two paragraphs, of which the first stated special matter, and the second paragraph was a general denial of the complaint. The appellee replied by a general denial to the first paragraph of the answer.
*231The issues joined were tried by a jury, and a verdict was returned for the appellee, assessing his damages in the sum of ninety-five dollars. The appellant’s motions for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. ChesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Pennsylvania Co. v. SedwickIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Barnett v. LeonardIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BolnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Higgins v. KendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Ziegler v. FunkhouserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Leaman v. SampleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. LevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Smith v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.