Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. Reding
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 12, 1991No. 9050PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals and the plaintiffs1 cross appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the *213plaintiffs, whereby the trial court awarded the plaintiffs specific performance of a purported contract to sell real estate, or, in the alternative, should the plaintiffs no longer want to purchase that real estate within 120 days of the final judgment, it ordered the defendant to return the plaintiffs’ deposit in the amount of $29,000. In his appeal, the defendant challenges only the court’s award of specific performance. We reverse the judgment in part.
The dispositive issue in this case is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Jay Realty, Inc. v. Ahearn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. BVD AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Cavallo v. LewisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Krondes v. O'BoyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Donohue v. PicinichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- L.G. Defelice, Inc. v. Fireman's InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Jewett City Trust Company v. Marino, No. 527301 (Dec. 5, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Joseph Dadon, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, Sylvia Dadon Dadon Marketing, Inc., Cross-Defendants-Appellees v. Milton Levinson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Joseph Dadon, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Dadon Marketing, Inc., Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Milton Levinson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.