Legal Opinion
Donohue v. Picinich
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 21, 1994No. 92 Civ. 317 (TFGD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge
(by designation):
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
This matter arises from a dispute involving a contract for the sale of real estate. Plaintiffs Thomas J. Donohue and Camille M. Donohue, residents of Bronx County, New York, have filed a complaint against defendant John Pieinich, a resident of New Fair-field, Connecticut, seeking specific performance of the contract for the sale of lots 39 and 40 on Fleetwood Drive in New Fairfield, Connecticut entered into between the parties in March 1992. Defendant, in turn, asks this court to rescind the contract on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hodges v. KowingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Harlach v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Four D's, Inc. v. MatteraConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Sidor v. KravecSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tilcon Minerals, Inc. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994