Legal Opinion

Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. State Land Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 14, 2007No. 99CV0132; A120754PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

This case involves the interpretation of Oregon’s fill and removal law, ORS 196.800 to 196.990. In January 1999, petitioner Bridgeview Vineyards 1 asked respondent Division of State Lands (DSL) for emergency authorization to place riprap in Sucker Creek, a nonnavigable stream located in Josephine County that is designated as salmonid habitat. After DSL denied the authorization, petitioner sought judicial review of DSL’s order in circuit court, alleging in its first claim for relief that its proposed activity fit within various exceptions to and exemptions from the fill and removal law’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Filipetti v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. Oregon State Land BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Gienger v. Department of State LandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. City of Portland v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API