Legal Opinion

Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. Oregon State Land Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 2013No. 99CV0132; A144945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

This case is before us for a second time, after the circuit court, on remand, granted summary judgment in favor of respondents on all eight of petitioners’ claims and dismissed the action.1 In 1999, respondent Division of State Lands (DSL) denied petitioners’ request for emergency authorization to undertake erosion control measures on agricultural property pursuant to Oregon’s fill and removal law, ORS 196.795 to 196.990. In Claim 1, petitioners sought judicial review of DSL’s order. In their related civil claim, Claim 2, petitioners sought declaratory relief concerning the fill and removal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Gustafson v. Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Schaff v. Ray's Land & Sea Food Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eastern Oregon Mining Ass'n v. Department of Environmental QualityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cervantes v. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Eastern Oregon Mining Association v. DEQOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Fort Klamath Critical Habitat Landowners v. WoodcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Fort Klamath Critical Habitat Landowners v. WoodcockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API