Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2005No. CC CR9800590; CA A116313; SC S51591PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This criminal case, arising out of defendant’s conviction for third-degree rape, raises various issues relating to the proper interpretation and application of Oregon’s statutory provisions respecting speedy trials, ORS 135.745 to 135.750. Pursuant to those statutes, and based on facts of this case, defendant moved to dismiss the charge in question. The trial court denied defendant’s motion. Defendant then pleaded guilty, but reserved his speedy trial challenge. See ORS 135.335(3) (authorizing such a procedure). On defendant’s appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the state had…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. VawterOregon Supreme Court · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GLUSHKOOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. DavidsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Baker v. City of LakesideOregon Supreme Court · 2007

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API