Legal Opinion
Hampel v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 18, 2011No. 10-542CPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge.
Plaintiff Natalya Hampel filed a complaint pro se requesting money damages for harm arising primarily from the circumstances relating to the death of her husband, Joseph Hampel, in March 2002. Defendant United States (“the Government”) now moves the court, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
For the reasons set forth below, while the court is sympathetic to the plight of Ms. Hampel, it is compelled to GRANT the Government’s motion to dismiss.
I.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Outlaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Jefferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Kirell Taylor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.