Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Bismarck v. District Court

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1934No. File No. Cr. 106PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuesslb, J.

Forsythe entered a plea of guilty to a charge of violating an ordinance of the city of Bismarck regulating plumbing. lie was given a jail sentence and committed thereunder. Thereupon he petitioned the district court of Burleigh county for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming the ordinance to be unconstitutional and void. The district court issued the writ and he was discharged.

The city of Bismarck insisting that the ordinance in question is constitutional and valid, seeks a review of the action of the district court. To 'that end the city has applied to this court for such relief as may be…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State v. First State Bank of JudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ex parte JilzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Harrigan & Reid Co. v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BroderickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Little v. GraffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. LePera v. SniderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Havener v. GlaserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API