Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Stewart

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1935No. Civil No. 3470PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Roy R. Stewart, a practical electrical contractor in the city of Tucson, seeks by this action to have Ordinance No. 693, adopted by the mayor and council of said city on November 7, 1932, declared null and void on the grounds that it is monopolistic, arbitrary, unreasonable, and oppressive, and on the further ground that it was not published as .required by the city charter.

The material provisions of the ordinance may be summarized as follows: It authorizes the city manager to appoint a city electrician whose duty it is to inspect and re-inspect all electrical wiring, devices, apparatus or…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. People v. . Beakes Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Baumgartner v. HastyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hawthorn v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. State ex rel. Beek v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. State ex rel. Brewster v. MohlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API