Legal Opinion

Harrigan & Reid Co. v. Burton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1923No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff is a Michigan corporation extensively engaged, among other things, in the business of selling and installing, as heating contractor and engineer, heating systems and apparatus in dwellings in the city of Detroit. Defendant Burton is commissioner in charge of the department of buildings and safety engineering of the city of Detroit, and defendant Brozo is chief inspector of the heating division of said department. Plaintiff filed this bill to restrain defendants from threatened enforcement against it of an ordinance of the city of Detroit entitled :

“An ordinance to regulate the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. G. F. Redmond & Co. v. Michigan Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People ex rel. Valentine v. Berrien Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Devereaux v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. McCormickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bellerive Investment Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Village of Orchard LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Gora v. City of FerndaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Portage Township v. Full Salvation UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API