Legal Opinion

Little v. Graff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1993No. Civ. 930224PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

We hold that it was not an error of law for the trial court to conclude that the warden does not have the statutory authority to con-fíne at the prison all women convicts who are sentenced to the Missouri River correctional center. Therefore, we decline to vacate the trial court’s writ of habeas corpus ordering a woman prisoner transferred from the prison to the Center.

Unlike penological practice elsewhere, the North Dakota Legislature has authorized the sentencing judge to designate the initial place of a convict’s confinement. NDCC 12.1-32-02(1); State ex rel. Olson v.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bettye Delores Pitts, Gwendolyn A. Samuels v. Richard ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. Matter of Adoption of KASNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Trinity Medical Center, Inc. v. HolumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. BASF Corp. v. SymingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Treiber v. Citizens State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API