Legal Opinion

State v. First State Bank of Jud

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiritiSTiANsoN, J.

This action was instituted by the attorney general under chapter 137, Laws 1923, to liquidate, and wdnd up the affairs of, the Mohall State Bank. The complaint in the action is in form and substance as prescribed by said chapter 137, and alleges that said Mohall State Bank closed voluntarily on November 24th, 1920; and that one W. Ii. McIntosh is the receiver in charge of such bank. Said McIntosh appeared and interposed an answer to the complaint. In such answer he admitted that the bank had been closed as alleged in the complaint and that he was the receiver in charge. He further alleged…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BroderickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bellemare v. Gateway Builders, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. CromwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API