Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Feigin
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1953No. Civ. 19587PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT (Robert H.), J. pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from judgment of dismissal pursuant to an order sustaining demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint without leave to amend. The latter order was made on November 24, 1950. Plaintiff, on January 12, 1951, moved to set aside the ruling previously made, and this motion was denied. Plaintiff then undertook to appeal from the order denying the motion to set aside the ruling, and this appeal was dismissed. (110 Cal.App.2d 56 [241 P.2d 1043].) The remittitur was filed with the county clerk on May 27, 1952, and was entered in the minutes of June…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Kritzer v. CitronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Langford v. KosterlitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Ingamells v. GoodfellowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Foreman v. Hunter Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andalon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Roberts v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Reiser Ex Rel. Reiser v. LohnerUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Miles v. Van GelderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Rice v. JaskolskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.