Rice v. Jaskolski
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The trial judge granted a directed verdict in this malpractice action, because the plaintiffs had failed to establish the prevailing professional standard of conduct. We find the testimony of the defendant dentist 1 supplied evidence on this point sufficient to withstand a directed verdict as to one count of the plaintiffs’ complaint, and we reverse.
I
Edmund J. Jaskolski, D.D.S., is a specialist in oral surgery. Petrina Rice first sought his services on April 28, 1972. Dr. Jaskolski found pericoronitis of her left mandibular third molar and a similar condition on the right which was not yet in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Bang v. Charles T. Miller HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Roberts v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Giacobazzi v. FetzerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sullivan v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Beattie v. FirnschildMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Moy v. Detroit Receiving HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Niemi v. Upper Peninsula Orthopedic Associates, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Belobradich v. SarnsethsiriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.