Legal Opinion

Rice v. Jaskolski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1981No. 64660, (Calendar No. 10)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial judge granted a directed verdict in this malpractice action, because the plaintiffs had failed to establish the prevailing professional standard of conduct. We find the testimony of the defendant dentist 1 supplied evidence on this point sufficient to withstand a directed verdict as to one count of the plaintiffs’ complaint, and we reverse.

I

Edmund J. Jaskolski, D.D.S., is a specialist in oral surgery. Petrina Rice first sought his services on April 28, 1972. Dr. Jaskolski found pericoronitis of her left mandibular third molar and a similar condition on the right which was not yet in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bang v. Charles T. Miller HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Roberts v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Giacobazzi v. FetzerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Beattie v. FirnschildMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Moy v. Detroit Receiving HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Niemi v. Upper Peninsula Orthopedic Associates, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Belobradich v. SarnsethsiriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API