Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Hunter Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1918No. Civ. No. 2330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

ZOOK, J., pro tem.

In this action plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants after demurrer sustained to plaintiff’s amended complaint. The cause of- action attempted to be stated arises out of an injury received by plaintiff on March 18, 1913, while in the employ of defendant Lumber Company, which, at the time of the accident, was operating under the employer’s liability law of 1911, commonly known as the Roseberry Act. The defendant surety company was the insurer for the Lumber Company; and defendant Lohse was the physician employed by the two corporations to treat plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hill v. BoughtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Linn v. PiersolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Borgeas v. Oregon Short Line RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Rosenberg v. FeiginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API