Legal Opinion
Reclamation District No. 684 v. Department of Industrial Relations
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 2005No. C044814PublishedCited by 6 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION1]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
Reclamation District No. 684 (District) appeals from a judgment that denied its petition for a writ of mandamus. District seeks to vacate the determination of the Director (Director) of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) that the maintenance work done on a levee to protect an island in the Delta from flooding was a public works project subject to the prevailing wage laws. (Lab. Code, § 1720 et seq.) 2
The Director is authorized to determine, pursuant to a request by an interested party, whether a “specific project or type of work to be performed” is covered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- McIntosh v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Citizens for Improved Sorrento Access, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Franklin v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- Azusa Land Partners v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Kaanaana v. Barrett Bus. Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Reliable Tree Experts v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local 104 v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Kaanaana v. Barrett Bus. Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.