Legal Opinion
Azusa Land Partners v. Department of Industrial Relations
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 2010No. B218275PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Azusa Land Partners (ALP) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085.) ALP seeks to vacate a determination by respondent Department of Industrial Relations (Department) that a planned community project is a “public work,” as defined *10by Labor Code section 1720,1 and subject to prevailing wage laws applicable to public improvement work performed by private contractors as a condition of regulatory approval for their construction projects. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Factual background
Petitioner and appellant ALP is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Oxbow Carbon & Minerals, LLC v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kaanaana v. Barrett Bus. Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Reliable Tree Experts v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Baker v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local 104 v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.