Legal Opinion

Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, Local 104 v. Duncan

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 2014No. A131489PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McGUINESS, P. J.

California’s prevailing wage law generally requires that workers employed on public works be paid the local prevailing wage for work of a similar character. (Lab. Code, 1 § 1771.) The question presented by this appeal is whether the prevailing wage law applies to an employee of a subcontractor who fabricates materials for a public works project at a permanent offsite manufacturing facility that is not exclusively dedicated to the project. We conclude that California law does not require the prevailing wage to be paid to the employee in this circumstance.

Factual and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2021
  2. California Valley Miwok Tribe v. California Gambling Control CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. John Busker v. Wabtec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Leopoldo Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. Busker v. WabtecCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API