Franklin v. City of Riverside
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiff is an officer, representative and member of the Hod Carriers and Laborers Union Local No. 1184 and a resident and taxpayer of the City of Riverside (hereinafter referred to as “defendant”). Defendant is a municipal corporation existing and operating under a valid freeholders’ charter pursuant to article XI, section 8, of the California Constitution.
*115Plaintiff filed an action for an injunction and declaratory relief, seeking a determination that a contract entered into between defendant and John Roseberry for the performance of a public work was invalid. A judgment was entered in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Smith v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Reclamation District No. 684 v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005