Legal Opinion

Franklin v. City of Riverside

California Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1962No. L. A. No. 26576PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiff is an officer, representative and member of the Hod Carriers and Laborers Union Local No. 1184 and a resident and taxpayer of the City of Riverside (hereinafter referred to as “defendant”). Defendant is a municipal corporation existing and operating under a valid freeholders’ charter pursuant to article XI, section 8, of the California Constitution.

*115Plaintiff filed an action for an injunction and declaratory relief, seeking a determination that a contract entered into between defendant and John Roseberry for the performance of a public work was invalid. A judgment was entered in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Smith v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Reclamation District No. 684 v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API