Legal Opinion

Mabry v. Scott

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1942No. Civ. 13263PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

March 25, 1931, defendant, Title Insurance and Trust Company, made a declaration of trust, acknowledging delivery to it of real and personal property of a value totaling some $1,350,000, to be held irrevocably in trust, for the use and benefit of named beneficiaries. The income from the trust estate was to be paid, and the corpus finally distributed, in accordance with the terms of the trust agreement. All of the properties placed in trust were owned by William J. Garland, settlor, and were about to be distributed to him from the estate of his deceased father.

Living…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Kent v. . Church of St. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anna P. Hatch v. The Riggs National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Leonardini v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Schuster v. SchusterArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Botsford v. Haskins & SellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Wogman v. Wells Fargo Bank & UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API