Botsford v. Haskins & Sells
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J. —
Plaintiffs Lawrence Investment Corporation and Paicines Properties Corporation, and Edward P. Botsford, as trustee, commenced an action for damages against defendant Haskins and Sells on a purported cause of action previously owned by the corporations. The superior court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant, from which judgment the several plaintiffs have appealed.
We have concluded that the appeal of plaintiff Botsford, as trustee, has merit and that those of the corporate plaintiffs do not. We proceed to state our reasons.
There was no substantial dispute…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- In Re the Accounting of HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bright v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estate of Van DeusenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- McCown v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goldin v. BartholowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Saks v. Damon Raike & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gurkewitz v. HabermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Linsteadt v. NicholasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.