Legal Opinion

United States v. Lorenc

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 6, 1990No. NMCM 89 1851PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant pled to and was found guilty of two specifications of signing a false official document and two specifications of larceny in violation of Articles 107 and 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 907 and 921, respectively. Both offenses arose from appellant’s attempt to wrongfully obtain Basic Allowance for Quarters funds ($5,081.86) and Variable Housing Allowance funds ($3,496.04) by submitting two Dependency Application forms which falsely included the appellant’s divorced husband as her dependent. A military judge sitting alone as a special court-martial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. United States v. MartinezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. AngelU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. MucthisonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. BoladoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. RobinsonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. WeatherspoonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. MontaninoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. SamuelsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API