Legal Opinion

United States v. Montanino

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 31, 1992No. ACMR 9100802PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*566OPINION OP THE COURT

GRAVELLE, Judge:

Pursuant to mixed pleas, the appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of unauthorized absence, wrongful appropriation, and two specifications of larceny, in violation of Articles 86 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 921 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for eleven months, and reduction to Private El.

The appellant asserts two errors on appeal. First, he asserts that he was denied his right to a speedy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. CookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. AngelU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MontaninoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API