Legal Opinion

United States v. Bolado

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided December 19, 1991No. NMCM No. 91-2682-MPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE, Judge:

This case comes to us by Government appeal filed pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862. At trial, the military judge dismissed certain charges and specifications based on a denial of appellant’s speedy trial rights contained in Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 707, Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM), United States, 1984.

TIMELINESS OF APPEAL

Article 62, UCMJ, requires that Government appeals from trial court rulings be “diligently prosecuted” and that an appeal “shall be forwarded by a means prescribed under regulations of the President…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. MicklaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. LincolnU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  2. United States v. DiesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. CombsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. RobinsonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  5. United States v. SantiagoNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API