Legal Opinion

State v. Prout

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 16, 2010No. 2006-203-C.APublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice SUTTELL,

for the Court.

Following a jury trial, the defendant, Justin Prout, was convicted of unlawful breaking and entering of a dwelling house, assault with a dangerous weapon, and simple assault. The defendant appeals these convictions, arguing that the trial justice erred in denying his motion for a new trial. The defendant contends that the trial justice misconceived or overlooked material evidence pertaining to (1) the trial witnesses’ credibility; and (2) the defendant’s alleged diminished capacity.

This case came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GomezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. State v. DiefenderferSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. State v. SivoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. State v. CorreraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. State v. BergevineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. James PaolaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  2. State v. CiprianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. State v. JimenezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  5. State v. VargasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API