Legal Opinion

State v. James Paola

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 25, 2013No. 2011-118-M.PPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court.

This case came before the Supreme Court on writ of certiorari on November 29, 2012, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. James Paola (defendant or Paola) appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury verdict finding him guilty of several acts of child molesta tion and sexual assault. 1 Specifically, on September 19, 2008, Paola was found guilty of one count of first-degree child molestation sexual assault and one count of third-degree sexual assault…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. BanachSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. State v. GomezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  4. State v. TexieiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. State v. SnowSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. Charles PonaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  2. State v. Charles MitchellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  3. State v. Ricardo FlorezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  4. State v. Kendall WhitakerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. State v. Blake CovingtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API