Legal Opinion
Aroostook County Regional Ophthalmology Center v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 19, 1996No. 95-1291PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:
Aroostook County Regional Ophthalmology Center (“ACROC” or “Company”) petitions for review of a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) order finding that it committed several unfair labor practices in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “Act”). See Aroostook County Regional Ophthalmology Center, 317 N.L.R.B. 218, 1995 WL 261523 (1995) (“Order”). 1
The Board found ACROC guilty of unfair labor practices for promulgating and enforcing overly restrictive rules limiting the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Beth Israel Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor RelationsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Medeco Security Locks, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Medeco Security Locks, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Doe v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.