Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Busch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1996No. SCBD 4068PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

The Oklahoma Bar Association filed a six-count formal complaint against Respondent Michael Busch alleging neglect of client matters, failure to adequately keep the client informed, failure to appeal twice, and intentional misrepresentation as to the status of a case, both to the court and the client. After a hearing the Professional Responsibility Tribunal recommended discipline in the form of an eighteen-month suspension, and that after the period of suspension Respondent be sub*1115ject to monitoring for Ms mental condition, Attention Deficit Disorder. Both parties have filed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Clifton C. Tang v. Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Department, and Honorable Justices Aron SteuerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MinterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PratherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API