Legal Opinion

Armitage v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 5, 1989No. 139-89CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is an action brought by 25 named plaintiffs on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons. The complaint invokes the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (1988), and various other provisions of Title 5 dealing with overtime pay and hours of work. Currently pending is plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, which defendant opposes. For the reasons which follow, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

The complaint seeks backpay for two types of premium pay to which federal employees may be entitled. Under 5 U.S.C. § 5542 (1988), employees…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Lanehart v. HornerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Busby School of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. Crone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Saunooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Buchan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API